Test: 20 minute IQ estimate

Trang Nguyen

PE Teacher, Vietnam , Ames English

IQ: 130

Population/% IQ 0 1 2 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Intellectual Capacities

Numerical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning
Spatial Reasoning
Low Lower Average Higher High
98%

Trang Nguyen performed better than 98% of all people who finished the BRGHT IQ Test

On March 31, 2023, Trang Nguyen finished the BRGHT IQ test. Trang performed better overall than 98% of all people who finished the test and performed best on the Spatial Reasoning section, with a percentile score of 98%.

IQ score vs average Iq scores 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 Trang's Score Whole Population Pe Teacher Foreign Trade University Economics Vietnam Age 25 - 34 Bachelors Degree
Accuracy

0.00%

On the BRGHT IQ test, Trang Nguyen answered 20 questions correctly and made 3 mistakes. Based on this performance, Trang worked with an accuracy level equal to or greater than 0.00% of individuals who completed the same test and received an IQ score within the same range .
Efficiency

0.00%

Trang completed the BRGHT IQ test in 20:00, answering a total of 23 questions. Based on this performance, Trang worked with an efficiency level equal to or greater than 0.00% of individuals who completed the BRGHT IQ test and received an IQ score within the the same range .
Logical Reasoning

Overall

94%

\

Trang performed better than 94% of people on the logical reasoning section. Logical reasoning involves the ability to reason, think critically, and solve problems using logical thinking processes. Some areas where someone with strong logical reasoning skills might excel are (1) identifying and solving problems, (2) analyzing information, breaking it down into smaller parts, and evaluating its components to reach conclusions and (3) strategic planning. .

Compared to

Vietnam
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
PE Teacher
Economics
Foreign Trade University
Low Lower Average Higher High
Numerical Reasoning

Overall

94%

\

Trang scored in the 94th percentile for the numerical reasoning section, which means he did better than 94th % of the people who took the test. Numerical reasoning involves the ability to work with numbers, data, and mathematical concepts. People who are good at numerical reasoning can understand complex information, analyze and manipulate data, and use abstract ideas to solve problems.

Compared to

Vietnam
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
PE Teacher
Economics
Foreign Trade University
Low Lower Average Higher High
Spatial Reasoning

Overall

98%

\

Trang achieved a percentile rank of 98% on the spatial reasoning section, indicating that Trang outperformed 98% of individuals who took the test. Spatial reasoning involves the ability to visualize, imagine, and differentiate objects in two or three dimensions. People with strong spatial reasoning skills might excel at understanding, manipulating, and modifying complex information, as well as translating abstract concepts into concrete ideas.

Compared to

Vietnam
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
PE Teacher
Economics
Foreign Trade University
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Vietnam
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
PE Teacher
Economics
Foreign Trade University
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Vietnam
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
PE Teacher
Economics
Foreign Trade University
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Vietnam
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
PE Teacher
Economics
Foreign Trade University
Low Lower Average Higher High
IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the test8080909010010011011012012013013014014015101520IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the testQuestion numberIQ estimate70.6176211226.746153846153845655.1538461538461172.1087598887.53286713286714642.603794841567478.26807683148.3195804195804590.764391430159483.03267764209.10629370629368550.663505938642584.15471353269.89300699300696541.219979768693586.78993849330.67972027972024519.040817507165688.89878888391.4664335664335501.291845247242892.93248566452.25314685314686467.3425556845016395.44989029513.0398601398601446.155018883825697.9024944573.8265734265734425.51287060322421099.94823312634.6132867132867408.29507265604883102.7543812695.4384.67734925220174106.5399696756.1867132867131352.81624416459437114.3511738816.9734265734267287.0738631641861117.2522279877.7601398601398262.6573704451446415113.6770865938.546853146853292.74726564469404115.7288833999.3335664335665275.478479929886119.10590121060.1202797202798247.05607590429645115.46742371120.9069930069932277.67903361862295116.87193331181.693706293706265.8580901725328520115.46885091242.4804195804195277.6670220627893117.47650661303.267132867133260.76974704605163117.47650661364.053846153846260.76974704605163125.4590235 (+54.84140234)26.746153846153845193.585525743011831126.0486597 (+53.93989983)87.53286713286714188.62289887584285127.7004641 (+49.43238731)148.3195804195804174.7206176899827128.8590549 (+45.8263773)209.10629370629368164.9694299789042129.68059 (+45.52587646)269.89300699300696158.055045290657745131.264062 (+44.47412354)330.67972027972024144.72787821509166132.1709091 (+43.2721202)391.4664335664335137.0954718819819134.2513504 (+41.31886477)452.25314685314686119.58560195031157135.5667517 (+40.11686144)513.0398601398601108.51463107644804136.9676029 (+39.06510851)573.826573426573496.7244779818079210138.5625904 (+38.61435726)634.613286713286783.30039225718735140.3169856 (+37.56260434)695.468.53466403930133142.1493186 (+35.60934891)756.186713286713153.11297858276487145.753511 (+31.40233723)816.973426573426722.778578326201455146.8515602 (+29.59933222)877.760139860139813.53693449737920715143.8774203 (+30.20033389)938.54685314685338.568546733522226145.0277147 (+29.29883139)999.333566433566528.887185463823812146.3012268 (+27.19532554)1060.120279720279818.168771810156613142.8129997 (+27.34557596)1120.906993006993247.527158783631535143.766758 (+26.89482471)1181.69370629370639.4999275600964720142.0631748 (+26.59432387)1242.480419580419553.838000932055934143.4698288 (+25.9933222)1303.26713286713341.99900887872468143.4698288 (+25.9933222)1364.05384615384641.99900887872468
The confidence interval during the test is based on a 2PL IRT model and the scores are estimated with an expected-a-posteriori (“EAP”) method.

Score Calculation

Click on the question number to see the worked out solution of the question

Question Section Answer Level Time used
Question 1  numerical

+

1 0:04
Question 2  logical

+

3 0:28
Question 3  spatial

+

1 0:13
Question 4  logical

+

7 0:16
Question 5  logical

+

9 0:11
Question 6  spatial

+

4 0:18
Question 7  spatial

+

11 0:08
Question 8  logical

+

7 0:15
Question 9  numerical

+

11 0:49
Question 10  numerical

+

10 0:11
Question 11  logical

+

11 0:22
Question 12  logical

+

12 0:38
Question 13  logical

+

15 1:09
Question 14  logical

+

15 1:30
Question 15  numerical

+

19 0:39
Question 16  spatial

+

18 1:12
Question 17  numerical

-

18 2:52
Question 18  logical

+

19 1:47
Question 19  numerical

+

18 0:34
Question 20  logical

-

18 2:35
Question 21  spatial

+

18 0:25
Question 22  numerical

-

20 2:35
Question 23  spatial

+

20 0:17

Discover how we calculate your IQ score

Best test result

Date

2023-03-31 17:44:32

BRGHT Score

98%

Numerical

94%

Logical

94%

Spatial

98%

Results

View results