Test: 15 minute IQ estimate

Mark Elsegood

Research Associate, Australia , csiro

IQ: 124

Population/% IQ 0 1 2 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Intellectual Capacities

Numerical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning
Spatial Reasoning
Low Lower Average Higher High
95%

Mark Elsegood performed better than 95% of all people who finished the BRGHT IQ Test

On May 08, 2024, Mark Elsegood finished the BRGHT IQ test. Mark performed better overall than 95% of all people who finished the test and performed best on the Spatial Reasoning section, with a percentile score of 93%.

IQ score vs average Iq scores 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 Mark's Score Whole Population Research Associate The University Of Western Australia Business Law Australia Age 45 - 54 Bachelors Degree
Accuracy

71.18%

On the BRGHT IQ test, Mark Elsegood answered 18 questions correctly and made 2 mistakes. Based on this performance, Mark worked with an accuracy level equal to or greater than 71.18% of individuals who completed the same test and received an IQ score within the same range .
Efficiency

31.57%

Mark completed the BRGHT IQ test in 14:36, answering a total of 20 questions. Based on this performance, Mark worked with an efficiency level equal to or greater than 31.57% of individuals who completed the BRGHT IQ test and received an IQ score within the the same range .
Logical Reasoning

Overall

82%

\

Mark performed better than 82% of people on the logical reasoning section. Logical reasoning involves the ability to reason, think critically, and solve problems using logical thinking processes. Some areas where someone with strong logical reasoning skills might excel are (1) identifying and solving problems, (2) analyzing information, breaking it down into smaller parts, and evaluating its components to reach conclusions and (3) strategic planning. .

Compared to

Australia
Age 45 - 54
Bachelors degree
Research Associate
Business Law
The University of Western Australia
Low Lower Average Higher High
Numerical Reasoning

Overall

87%

\

Mark scored in the 87th percentile for the numerical reasoning section, which means he did better than 87th % of the people who took the test. Numerical reasoning involves the ability to work with numbers, data, and mathematical concepts. People who are good at numerical reasoning can understand complex information, analyze and manipulate data, and use abstract ideas to solve problems.

Compared to

Australia
Age 45 - 54
Bachelors degree
Research Associate
Business Law
The University of Western Australia
Low Lower Average Higher High
Spatial Reasoning

Overall

93%

\

Mark achieved a percentile rank of 93% on the spatial reasoning section, indicating that Mark outperformed 93% of individuals who took the test. Spatial reasoning involves the ability to visualize, imagine, and differentiate objects in two or three dimensions. People with strong spatial reasoning skills might excel at understanding, manipulating, and modifying complex information, as well as translating abstract concepts into concrete ideas.

Compared to

Australia
Age 45 - 54
Bachelors degree
Research Associate
Business Law
The University of Western Australia
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Australia
Age 45 - 54
Bachelors degree
Research Associate
Business Law
The University of Western Australia
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Australia
Age 45 - 54
Bachelors degree
Research Associate
Business Law
The University of Western Australia
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Australia
Age 45 - 54
Bachelors degree
Research Associate
Business Law
The University of Western Australia
Low Lower Average Higher High
IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the test70708080909010010011011012012013013014014015101520IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the testQuestion numberIQ estimate68.5238264126.746153846153845655.1538461538462171.4165687897.13076923076922630.777192361840474.31514816167.5153846153846606.351351022916876.63419425237.89999999999995586.809139378605979.98941217308.28461538461534558.5352817658904583.1058923378.66923076923075532.273227447433485.02499322449.0538461538461516.101286526581487.68707117519.4384615384615493.668402977998190.78089742589.8230769230769467.597249083906492.56388791660.2076923076922452.572287885204841095.95965681730.5923076923076423.956714062407299.42491595800.9769230769231394.75555762992724101.4831032871.3615384615383377.41155915897093105.4396387941.7461538461539344.0704999751405110.02685971012.1307692307691305.4147589711581615112.50055451082.5153846153846284.5693486891471109.50630011152.8999999999999309.8014272900374107.44422641223.2846153846153327.17817576450267108.62065731293.6692307692306317.2645903828956108.62065731364.053846153846317.264590382895620124.4169817 (+55.89315526)26.746153846153845184.151619775416861125.3564686 (+53.93989983)97.13076923076922176.23472120631305125.8510413 (+51.53589316)167.5153846153846172.06704014173062126.5173328 (+49.88313856)237.89999999999995166.45231368602919128.2197961 (+48.23038397)308.28461538461534152.105941261923255129.08252 (+45.97662771)378.66923076923075144.83591220066114130.2503688 (+45.22537563)449.0538461538461134.99464636554035130.808941 (+43.12186978)519.4384615384615130.2876530570055132.5505135 (+41.76961603)589.8230769230769115.61171431723074133.7325023 (+41.16861436)660.2076923076922105.6512931871143310135.9262678 (+39.96661102)730.592307692307687.16479950148744137.8890228 (+38.46410684)800.976923076923170.62499324047042139.195958 (+37.71285476)871.361538461538359.611669855245964141.199238 (+35.75959933)941.746153846153942.7303658943174143.5327028 (+33.50584307)1012.130769230769123.066650147529815144.6541438 (+32.15358932)1082.515384615384613.616455019835485141.2091382 (+31.70283806)1152.899999999999942.64693867216488138.8465637 (+31.40233723)1223.284615384615362.55595718092286139.5722433 (+30.95158598)1293.669230769230656.44077685075479139.5722433 (+30.95158598)1364.05384615384656.4407768507547920
The confidence interval during the test is based on a 2PL IRT model and the scores are estimated with an expected-a-posteriori (“EAP”) method.

Score Calculation

Click on the question number to see the worked out solution of the question

Question Section Answer Level Time used
Question 1  numerical

+

1 0:06
Question 2  spatial

+

2 0:10
Question 3  logical

+

3 0:24
Question 4  numerical

+

4 0:11
Question 5  spatial

+

5 0:31
Question 6  logical

+

6 1:23
Question 7  numerical

+

7 0:21
Question 8  spatial

+

8 0:26
Question 9  logical

+

9 1:09
Question 10  numerical

+

10 0:47
Question 11  spatial

+

11 1:40
Question 12  logical

+

12 1:02
Question 13  numerical

+

13 0:29
Question 14  spatial

+

14 0:19
Question 15  logical

+

15 0:43
Question 16  numerical

+

16 0:31
Question 17  spatial

+

17 1:06
Question 18  logical

-

18 0:23
Question 19  numerical

-

16 1:50
Question 20  spatial

+

14 0:56

Discover how we calculate your IQ score

Best test result

Date

2024-05-08 11:19:31

BRGHT Score

95%

Numerical

87%

Logical

82%

Spatial

93%

Results

View results