Test: 20 minute IQ estimate

K A

Director of Admissions, Ethiopia , organization organizers (orgorg)

IQ: 130

Population/% IQ 0 1 2 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Intellectual Capacities

Numerical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning
Spatial Reasoning
Low Lower Average Higher High
98%

K A performed better than 98% of all people who finished the BRGHT IQ Test

On February 26, 2023, K A finished the BRGHT IQ test. K performed better overall than 98% of all people who finished the test and performed best on the Logical Reasoning section, with a percentile score of 98%.

IQ score vs average Iq scores 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 K'S Score Whole Population Director Of Admissions Hiram College Applied Physics Ethiopia Age Min - 18 Upper Secondary
Accuracy

0.00%

On the BRGHT IQ test, K A answered 20 questions correctly and made 2 mistakes. Based on this performance, K worked with an accuracy level equal to or greater than 0.00% of individuals who completed the same test and received an IQ score within the same range .
Efficiency

0.00%

K completed the BRGHT IQ test in 20:00, answering a total of 22 questions. Based on this performance, K worked with an efficiency level equal to or greater than 0.00% of individuals who completed the BRGHT IQ test and received an IQ score within the the same range .
Logical Reasoning

Overall

98%

\

K performed better than 98% of people on the logical reasoning section. Logical reasoning involves the ability to reason, think critically, and solve problems using logical thinking processes. Some areas where someone with strong logical reasoning skills might excel are (1) identifying and solving problems, (2) analyzing information, breaking it down into smaller parts, and evaluating its components to reach conclusions and (3) strategic planning. .

Compared to

Ethiopia
Age min - 18
Upper secondary
Director of Admissions
Applied Physics
Hiram College
Low Lower Average Higher High
Numerical Reasoning

Overall

85%

\

K scored in the 85th percentile for the numerical reasoning section, which means he did better than 85th % of the people who took the test. Numerical reasoning involves the ability to work with numbers, data, and mathematical concepts. People who are good at numerical reasoning can understand complex information, analyze and manipulate data, and use abstract ideas to solve problems.

Compared to

Ethiopia
Age min - 18
Upper secondary
Director of Admissions
Applied Physics
Hiram College
Low Lower Average Higher High
Spatial Reasoning

Overall

77%

\

K achieved a percentile rank of 77% on the spatial reasoning section, indicating that K outperformed 77% of individuals who took the test. Spatial reasoning involves the ability to visualize, imagine, and differentiate objects in two or three dimensions. People with strong spatial reasoning skills might excel at understanding, manipulating, and modifying complex information, as well as translating abstract concepts into concrete ideas.

Compared to

Ethiopia
Age min - 18
Upper secondary
Director of Admissions
Applied Physics
Hiram College
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Ethiopia
Age min - 18
Upper secondary
Director of Admissions
Applied Physics
Hiram College
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Ethiopia
Age min - 18
Upper secondary
Director of Admissions
Applied Physics
Hiram College
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Ethiopia
Age min - 18
Upper secondary
Director of Admissions
Applied Physics
Hiram College
Low Lower Average Higher High
IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the test8080909010010011011012012013013014014015101520IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the testQuestion numberIQ estimate71.4724365226.746153846153845655.1538461538461175.3362039890.42747252747253621.848415180114877.57029802154.10879120879122602.590665972816480.44101155217.79010989010985577.845297071684682.34297555281.47142857142853561.4504877568047584.60198178345.15274725274725541.977997043841886.65404292408.8340659340659524.289359937977190.65317306472.5153846153846489.8171112560412492.09469855536.1967032967033477.3912527530661794.17573749599.8780219780219459.45282878101681096.19777432663.5593406593406442.0229993248172101.4892523727.2406593406594396.410794090469104.1137456790.9219780219779373.78782773690745107.296253854.6032967032967346.354815278042110.6950322918.2846153846153317.057553772952415113.9025379981.9659340659341289.40905769163015113.90253791045.6472527472527289.40905769163015111.65799841109.3285714285714308.7568459487069111.65799841173.00989010989308.7568459487069116.32746751236.6912087912087268.506318426033120114.88506141300.3725274725273280.9397679269643114.88506141364.053846153846280.9397679269643124.6610843 (+53.18864775)26.746153846153845196.671069311946381125.9705946 (+50.63439065)90.42747252747253185.38317281932314127.0026853 (+49.43238731)154.10879120879122176.48661630901677127.9201434 (+47.47913189)217.79010989010985168.5781855404972128.7703545 (+46.42737896)281.47142857142853161.24941983548535129.9776078 (+45.37562604)345.15274725274725150.84297273239054130.977916 (+44.32387312)408.8340659340659142.2203792363939132.7232899 (+42.07011686)472.5153846153846127.17536686131803133.7140642 (+41.61936561)536.1967032967033118.63495561971513135.043851 (+40.86811352)599.8780219780219107.1722770832858510136.6151366 (+40.41736227)663.559340659340693.6278948884584139.6528583 (+38.16360601)727.240659340659467.44292596097034140.9250979 (+36.81135225)790.921978021977956.47630139152477142.905602 (+35.60934891)854.603296703296739.4044816296514144.3511257 (+33.65609349)918.284615384615326.94415825717385415145.7556264 (+31.85308848)981.965934065934114.837451221339961145.7556264 (+31.85308848)1045.647252747252714.837451221339961143.5110869 (+31.85308848)1109.328571428571434.18523947841652143.5110869 (+31.85308848)1173.0098901098934.18523947841652145.7765493 (+29.4490818)1236.691208791208714.65709734972688220144.3341432 (+29.4490818)1300.372527472527327.09054685065803144.3341432 (+29.4490818)1364.05384615384627.09054685065803
The confidence interval during the test is based on a 2PL IRT model and the scores are estimated with an expected-a-posteriori (“EAP”) method.

Score Calculation

Click on the question number to see the worked out solution of the question

Question Section Answer Level Time used
Question 1  spatial

+

3 0:22
Question 2  numerical

+

4 0:10
Question 3  logical

+

5 0:32
Question 4  numerical

+

4 0:17
Question 5  numerical

+

6 0:15
Question 6  spatial

+

7 0:20
Question 7  spatial

+

9 1:02
Question 8  logical

+

5 0:32
Question 9  numerical

+

10 1:45
Question 10  logical

+

5 0:19
Question 11  spatial

+

12 0:40
Question 12  spatial

+

13 0:38
Question 13  numerical

+

15 2:39
Question 14  logical

+

13 1:42
Question 15  logical

+

17 1:08
Question 16  logical

+

16 1:20
Question 17  logical

+

17 0:52
Question 18  spatial

+

1:03
Question 19  logical

-

19 1:52
Question 20  spatial

+

0:31
Question 21  logical

+

19 0:20
Question 22  logical

-

20 1:38

Discover how we calculate your IQ score

Best test result

Date

2023-02-26 16:47:53

BRGHT Score

98%

Numerical

85%

Logical

98%

Spatial

77%

Results

View results