Test: 15 minute IQ estimate

Daria Kyryliuk

Software Test Engineer, Ukraine , National Information Systems

IQ: 127

Population/% IQ 0 1 2 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Intellectual Capacities

Numerical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning
Spatial Reasoning
Low Lower Average Higher High
96%

Daria Kyryliuk performed better than 96% of all people who finished the BRGHT IQ Test

On April 16, 2024, Daria Kyryliuk finished the BRGHT IQ test. Daria performed better overall than 96% of all people who finished the test and performed best on the Logical Reasoning section, with a percentile score of 92%.

Accuracy

94.06%

On the BRGHT IQ test, Daria Kyryliuk answered 19 questions correctly and made 1 mistakes. Based on this performance, Daria worked with an accuracy level equal to or greater than 94.06% of individuals who completed the same test and received an IQ score within the same range .
Efficiency

35.86%

Daria completed the BRGHT IQ test in 14:17, answering a total of 20 questions. Based on this performance, Daria worked with an efficiency level equal to or greater than 35.86% of individuals who completed the BRGHT IQ test and received an IQ score within the the same range .
Logical Reasoning

Overall

92%

\

Daria performed better than 92% of people on the logical reasoning section. Logical reasoning involves the ability to reason, think critically, and solve problems using logical thinking processes. Some areas where someone with strong logical reasoning skills might excel are (1) identifying and solving problems, (2) analyzing information, breaking it down into smaller parts, and evaluating its components to reach conclusions and (3) strategic planning. .

Compared to

Ukraine
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
Software Test Engineer
Computer And Information Security
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Low Lower Average Higher High
Numerical Reasoning

Overall

85%

\

Daria scored in the 85th percentile for the numerical reasoning section, which means he did better than 85th % of the people who took the test. Numerical reasoning involves the ability to work with numbers, data, and mathematical concepts. People who are good at numerical reasoning can understand complex information, analyze and manipulate data, and use abstract ideas to solve problems.

Compared to

Ukraine
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
Software Test Engineer
Computer And Information Security
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Low Lower Average Higher High
Spatial Reasoning

Overall

91%

\

Daria achieved a percentile rank of 91% on the spatial reasoning section, indicating that Daria outperformed 91% of individuals who took the test. Spatial reasoning involves the ability to visualize, imagine, and differentiate objects in two or three dimensions. People with strong spatial reasoning skills might excel at understanding, manipulating, and modifying complex information, as well as translating abstract concepts into concrete ideas.

Compared to

Ukraine
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
Software Test Engineer
Computer And Information Security
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Ukraine
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
Software Test Engineer
Computer And Information Security
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Ukraine
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
Software Test Engineer
Computer And Information Security
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Ukraine
Age 25 - 34
Bachelors degree
Software Test Engineer
Computer And Information Security
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Low Lower Average Higher High
IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the test70708080909010010011011012012013013014014015101520IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the testQuestion numberIQ estimate69.2822795826.746153846153845655.1538461538462172.6214465997.13076923076922625.936759599393475.3279392167.5153846153846602.25545568122477.25793168237.89999999999995585.368382670587880.23537559308.28461538461534559.3163055839456583.32412031378.66923076923075532.290367239864785.37603572449.0538461538461514.336491335723488.19883879519.4384615384615489.637492696010782.93972572589.8230769230769535.653747921246884.84157514660.2076923076922519.01292140894591087.58161267730.5923076923076495.03810567927690.57872977800.9769230769231468.813891929913692.24180988871.3615384615383454.262252119641494.74306667941.7461538461539432.376723246447997.841832191012.1307692307691405.263104787048615100.36059191082.5153846153846383.2244282099217103.8817781152.8999999999999352.4147088433841109.14271471223.2846153846153306.3824972227856111.04522891293.6692307692306289.7358541252422111.04522891364.053846153846289.735854125242220125.1754348 (+55.89315526)26.746153846153845166.099196266842741126.2608456 (+53.639399)97.13076923076922156.60205527234967126.7135819 (+51.38564274)167.5153846153846152.6406969141401127.4415711 (+50.1836394)237.89999999999995146.2709282021492129.2170116 (+48.98163606)308.28461538461534130.736155414152345130.2022505 (+46.87813022)378.66923076923075122.11549959270042131.202413 (+45.8263773)449.0538461538461113.36426494987381132.5227119 (+44.32387312)519.4384615384615101.8118966834677123.6575888 (+40.71786311)589.8230769230769179.3800648046394124.8081862 (+39.96661102)660.2076923076922169.3125534789917310126.6467212 (+39.06510851)730.5923076923076153.2257159733058128.7423358 (+38.16360601)800.9769230769231134.88948044792755130.1049151 (+37.86310518)871.3615384615383122.96716671231661132.0051702 (+37.26210351)941.7461538461539106.34028998844553134.3526836 (+36.51085142)1012.130769230769185.7999867156996715135.8196904 (+35.4590985)1082.515384615384672.96395139988704138.2891236 (+34.40734558)1152.899999999999951.3568732946643141.296304 (+32.15358932)1223.284615384615325.04460723402542142.5978166 (+31.55258765)1293.669230769230613.65661628580483142.5978166 (+31.55258765)1364.05384615384613.6566162858048320
The confidence interval during the test is based on a 2PL IRT model and the scores are estimated with an expected-a-posteriori (“EAP”) method.

Score Calculation

Click on the question number to see the worked out solution of the question

Question Section Answer Level Time used
Question 1  numerical

+

1 0:08
Question 2  spatial

+

2 0:16
Question 3  logical

+

3 0:14
Question 4  numerical

+

4 0:08
Question 5  spatial

+

5 0:15
Question 6  logical

+

6 0:20
Question 7  numerical

+

7 0:13
Question 8  spatial

+

8 0:39
Question 9  logical

+

9 0:36
Question 10  numerical

-

10 0:43
Question 11  spatial

+

9 0:20
Question 12  logical

+

10 0:14
Question 13  numerical

+

11 1:31
Question 14  spatial

+

12 0:43
Question 15  logical

+

13 1:39
Question 16  numerical

+

14 1:30
Question 17  spatial

+

15 0:22
Question 18  logical

+

16 0:51
Question 19  numerical

+

17 0:35
Question 20  spatial

+

18 2:50

Discover how we calculate your IQ score

Best test result

Date

2024-04-16 11:12:36

BRGHT Score

96%

Numerical

85%

Logical

92%

Spatial

91%

Results

View results