Test: 15 minute IQ estimate

Charlene Mae Cortez

Solutions Architect, Philippines , Snapchat

IQ: 110

Population/% IQ 0 1 2 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Intellectual Capacities

Numerical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning
Spatial Reasoning
Low Lower Average Higher High
76%

Charlene Mae Cortez performed better than 76% of all people who finished the BRGHT IQ Test

On November 20, 2023, Charlene Mae Cortez finished the BRGHT IQ test. Charlene Mae performed better overall than 76% of all people who finished the test and performed best on the Numerical Reasoning section, with a percentile score of 92%.

IQ score vs average Iq scores 91 94 97 100 103 106 109 112 115 Charlene Mae's Score Whole Population Solutions Architect University Of Brighton Information Systems Philippines Age 18 - 24 Bachelors Degree
Accuracy

75.53%

On the BRGHT IQ test, Charlene Mae Cortez answered 17 questions correctly and made 3 mistakes. Based on this performance, Charlene Mae worked with an accuracy level equal to or greater than 75.53% of individuals who completed the same test and received an IQ score within the same range .
Efficiency

66.81%

Charlene Mae completed the BRGHT IQ test in 10:37, answering a total of 20 questions. Based on this performance, Charlene Mae worked with an efficiency level equal to or greater than 66.81% of individuals who completed the BRGHT IQ test and received an IQ score within the the same range .
Logical Reasoning

Overall

37%

\

Charlene Mae performed better than 37% of people on the logical reasoning section. Logical reasoning involves the ability to reason, think critically, and solve problems using logical thinking processes. Some areas where someone with strong logical reasoning skills might excel are (1) identifying and solving problems, (2) analyzing information, breaking it down into smaller parts, and evaluating its components to reach conclusions and (3) strategic planning. .

Compared to

Philippines
Age 18 - 24
Bachelors degree
Solutions Architect
Information Systems
University of Brighton
Low Lower Average Higher High
Numerical Reasoning

Overall

92%

\

Charlene Mae scored in the 92nd percentile for the numerical reasoning section, which means he did better than 92nd % of the people who took the test. Numerical reasoning involves the ability to work with numbers, data, and mathematical concepts. People who are good at numerical reasoning can understand complex information, analyze and manipulate data, and use abstract ideas to solve problems.

Compared to

Philippines
Age 18 - 24
Bachelors degree
Solutions Architect
Information Systems
University of Brighton
Low Lower Average Higher High
Spatial Reasoning

Overall

62%

\

Charlene Mae achieved a percentile rank of 62% on the spatial reasoning section, indicating that Charlene Mae outperformed 62% of individuals who took the test. Spatial reasoning involves the ability to visualize, imagine, and differentiate objects in two or three dimensions. People with strong spatial reasoning skills might excel at understanding, manipulating, and modifying complex information, as well as translating abstract concepts into concrete ideas.

Compared to

Philippines
Age 18 - 24
Bachelors degree
Solutions Architect
Information Systems
University of Brighton
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Philippines
Age 18 - 24
Bachelors degree
Solutions Architect
Information Systems
University of Brighton
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Philippines
Age 18 - 24
Bachelors degree
Solutions Architect
Information Systems
University of Brighton
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Philippines
Age 18 - 24
Bachelors degree
Solutions Architect
Information Systems
University of Brighton
Low Lower Average Higher High
IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the test70708080909010010011011012012013013015101520IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the testQuestion numberIQ estimate68.5619865426.746153846153845655.1538461538462170.4419295197.13076923076922636.814516938177972.16020546167.5153846153846620.052291322288674.39288724237.89999999999995598.271903977076878.15627037308.28461538461534561.559129583515580.33791655378.66923076923075540.276607690152682.35384982449.0538461538461520.610658000021477.96314359519.4384615384615563.443131203714681.0982644589.8230769230769532.859218027863383.07776373660.2076923076922513.5486907925261085.62019062730.5923076923076488.746659900036487.97296952800.9769230769231465.794694122046489.89635802871.3615384615383447.0315425532225592.82526201941.7461538461539418.45932775043397.105890461012.1307692307691376.700691722505161594.171317471082.5153846153846405.328209087307790.939164521152.8999999999999436.858695882781895.172473621223.2846153846153395.561672257052296.010003021293.6692307692306387.391356637751596.010003021364.053846153846387.391356637751520124.4551418 (+55.89315526)26.746153846153845109.901681660825721124.5320798 (+54.09015025)97.13076923076922109.15113194493222125.0483524 (+52.88814691)167.5153846153846104.114759328893125.9287804 (+51.53589316)237.8999999999999595.52595660851216127.5886577 (+49.43238731)308.2846153846153479.333424964687655127.8170484 (+47.47913189)378.6692307692307577.10541419608137128.7812288 (+46.42737896)449.053846153846167.69958588081909120.934763 (+42.97161937)519.4384615384615144.2438864590806123.3186317 (+42.22036728)589.8230769230769120.98863140813557124.5468789 (+41.46911519)660.2076923076922109.0067622977044310126.1878033 (+40.56761269)730.592307692307692.99912115510233128.2400814 (+40.26711185)800.976923076923172.97861862707441129.4122178 (+39.51585977)871.361538461538361.54412518315712131.5898697 (+38.76460768)941.746153846153940.300568505273645134.367994 (+37.26210351)1012.130769230769113.19924872715830615129.4801655 (+35.30884808)1082.515384615384660.88127721671651121.7405001 (+30.80133556)1152.8999999999999136.38371276162786124.1708042 (+28.99833055)1223.2846153846153112.67546863567316124.8580832 (+28.84808013)1293.6692307692306105.9708846413539124.8580832 (+28.84808013)1364.053846153846105.970884641353920
The confidence interval during the test is based on a 2PL IRT model and the scores are estimated with an expected-a-posteriori (“EAP”) method.

Score Calculation

Click on the question number to see the worked out solution of the question

Question Section Answer Level Time used
Question 1  numerical

+

1 0:13
Question 2  spatial

+

1 0:09
Question 3  logical

+

2 0:07
Question 4  numerical

+

3 0:22
Question 5  spatial

+

4 0:25
Question 6  logical

+

5 0:40
Question 7  numerical

+

6 0:32
Question 8  spatial

+

7 0:40
Question 9  logical

-

8 0:47
Question 10  numerical

+

9 0:31
Question 11  spatial

+

8 0:21
Question 12  logical

+

9 1:09
Question 13  numerical

+

10 0:52
Question 14  spatial

+

11 0:19
Question 15  logical

+

12 0:26
Question 16  numerical

+

13 0:21
Question 17  spatial

-

14 0:31
Question 18  logical

-

15 0:28
Question 19  numerical

+

13 0:52
Question 20  spatial

+

11 0:39

Discover how we calculate your IQ score

Best test result

Date

2023-11-20 04:08:55

BRGHT Score

76%

Numerical

92%

Logical

37%

Spatial

62%

Results

View results