Test: 20 minute IQ estimate

Tú Hà

Chief Learning Officer, Vietnam , dontblink

IQ: 99

Population/% IQ 0 1 2 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Intellectual Capacities

Numerical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning
Spatial Reasoning
Low Lower Average Higher High
48%

Tú Hà performed better than 48% of all people who finished the BRGHT IQ Test

On March 01, 2023, Tú Hà finished the BRGHT IQ test. Tú performed better overall than 48% of all people who finished the test and performed best on the Numerical Reasoning section, with a percentile score of 72%.

IQ score vs average Iq scores 85 88 91 94 97 100 103 106 Tú'S Score Whole Population Chief Learning Officer Vietnam Age Min - 18 Lower Secondary
Logical Reasoning

Overall

56%

\

tú performed better than 56% of people on the logical reasoning section. Logical reasoning involves the ability to reason, think critically, and solve problems using logical thinking processes. Some areas where someone with strong logical reasoning skills might excel are (1) identifying and solving problems, (2) analyzing information, breaking it down into smaller parts, and evaluating its components to reach conclusions and (3) strategic planning. .

Compared to

Vietnam
Age min - 18
Lower secondary
Chief Learning Officer
Low Lower Average Higher High
Numerical Reasoning

Overall

72%

\

tú scored in the 72nd percentile for the numerical reasoning section, which means he did better than 72nd % of the people who took the test. Numerical reasoning involves the ability to work with numbers, data, and mathematical concepts. People who are good at numerical reasoning can understand complex information, analyze and manipulate data, and use abstract ideas to solve problems.

Compared to

Vietnam
Age min - 18
Lower secondary
Chief Learning Officer
Low Lower Average Higher High
Spatial Reasoning

Overall

8%

\

tú achieved a percentile rank of 8% on the spatial reasoning section, indicating that tú outperformed 8% of individuals who took the test. Spatial reasoning involves the ability to visualize, imagine, and differentiate objects in two or three dimensions. People with strong spatial reasoning skills might excel at understanding, manipulating, and modifying complex information, as well as translating abstract concepts into concrete ideas.

Compared to

Vietnam
Age min - 18
Lower secondary
Chief Learning Officer
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Vietnam
Age min - 18
Lower secondary
Chief Learning Officer
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Vietnam
Age min - 18
Lower secondary
Chief Learning Officer
Low Lower Average Higher High

Compared to

Vietnam
Age min - 18
Lower secondary
Chief Learning Officer
Low Lower Average Higher High
IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the test6060707080809090100100110110151015202530IQ estimation with 95% confidence interval during the testQuestion numberIQ estimate53.5066014326.746153846153845655.1538461538461154.8083053772.86021220159152642.366031022546257.55753249118.97427055702917615.357886702609657.55753249165.08832891246684615.357886702609660.85307818211.20238726790447582.9827609036852556.883387257.31644562334213621.980627551240663.34925736303.4305039787798558.460535257605267.34958721349.54456233421746519.161677201015267.34958721395.65862068965515519.161677201015268.62640017441.77267904509284506.61838879159361071.24139206487.88673740053054480.928958449658774.39951808534.000795755968449.903830333148777.44422418580.1148541114059419.9929286530980378.24409013626.2289124668436412.135122010833181.95091166672.342970822281375.71966165863981585.52599572718.4570291777188340.598377681446383.89940908764.5710875331565356.577809335635881.40028675810.6851458885941381.128948163600582.72051228856.7992042440318368.159178774479982.08819151902.9132625994695374.371037607119942082.8548871949.0273209549072366.8390934328836684.88043758995.1413793103449346.9402790888687.839528531041.2554376657822317.8704525723443389.503854871087.3694960212201301.520269637522887.627694891133.4835543766578319.95148594123932586.791356461179.5976127320955328.167594757366287.797028571225.7116710875332318.2879680952742787.797028571271.825729442971318.2879680952742787.080021381317.9397877984084325.331778186328587.080021381364.053846153846325.331778186328530105.6434963 (+52.13689482)26.746153846153845142.965975681555281106.3441985 (+51.53589316)72.86021220159152136.0823434951809107.8914223 (+50.33388982)118.97427055702917120.88256506509538107.8914223 (+50.33388982)165.08832891246684120.88256506509538109.5342134 (+48.68113523)211.20238726790447104.743942364716195101.0570097 (+44.1736227)257.31644562334213188.0231810992131103.7666196 (+40.41736227)303.4305039787798161.4042322113624105.9639445 (+38.61435726)349.54456233421746139.81792298954906105.9639445 (+38.61435726)395.65862068965515139.81792298954906106.7900062 (+38.16360601)441.77267904509284131.7027717888216810108.5034956 (+37.26210351)487.88673740053054114.86961586427503110.7601191 (+36.360601)534.00079575596892.70076216515338111.8515698 (+34.40734558)580.114854111405981.97845505611065112.9519365 (+34.70784641)626.228912466843671.16855694138292115.7572556 (+33.80634391)672.34297082228143.6093710065779315118.8815884 (+33.35559265)718.457029177718812.916224238078598114.8509951 (+30.95158598)764.571087533156552.51238767197026110.5488677 (+29.14858097)810.685145888594194.77607533471166111.7188428 (+28.99833055)856.799204244031883.28235168182232110.6357708 (+28.5475793)902.913262599469593.9223477231566920111.5527168 (+28.69782972)949.027320954907284.91435781268888113.4280169 (+28.5475793)995.141379310344966.49158920489674115.9363566 (+28.09682805)1041.255437665782241.84989989707526117.4504325 (+27.94657763)1087.369496021220126.975762698484914113.9215179 (+26.29382304)1133.483554376657861.6434821007467225112.183677 (+25.39232053)1179.597612732095578.71586533426205113.0390987 (+25.24207012)1225.711671087533270.3122844084013113.0390987 (+25.24207012)1271.82572944297170.3122844084013111.5708394 (+24.49081803)1317.939787798408484.73632318061254111.5708394 (+24.49081803)1364.05384615384684.7363231806125430
The confidence interval during the test is based on a 2PL IRT model and the scores are estimated with an expected-a-posteriori (“EAP”) method.

Score Calculation

Click on the question number to see the worked out solution of the question

Question Section Answer Level Time used
Question 1  numerical

+

1 0:08
Question 2  spatial

-

2 0:07
Question 3  spatial

+

1 0:06
Question 4  logical

+

3 0:16
Question 5  numerical

+

0:16
Question 6  numerical

+

4 0:13
Question 7  logical

-

2 0:19
Question 8  logical

+

6 0:28
Question 9  numerical

+

7 0:25
Question 10  numerical

-

1:47
Question 11  spatial

+

4 0:17
Question 12  logical

+

5 0:14
Question 13  numerical

+

8 0:18
Question 14  logical

+

6 0:17
Question 15  spatial

+

6 0:40
Question 16  numerical

+

11 1:31
Question 17  numerical

+

12 0:25
Question 18  numerical

-

13 1:00
Question 19  spatial

-

11 0:19
Question 20  logical

+

9 0:27
Question 21  logical

-

11 0:43
Question 22  logical

+

9 1:08
Question 23  numerical

+

12 1:45
Question 24  numerical

+

13 0:56
Question 25  logical

+

12 0:48
Question 26  spatial

-

14 1:09
Question 27  numerical

-

15 2:16
Question 28  spatial

+

12 0:26
Question 29  numerical

+

0:19
Question 30  numerical

-

16 0:16

Discover how we calculate your IQ score

Best test result

Date

2023-03-01 14:08:29

BRGHT Score

48%

Numerical

72%

Logical

56%

Spatial

8%

Results

View results